Thank's for the quick reply!

I know that is not a problem of PhpEd, the debugger work very well... the problem is only "mine"

I just wondered if someone had not identified a way to fix the problem on CI and maybe you knew.

I'm working with CI and I think is a real shame not being able to use the potential of PhpEd.
I have found this article: http://forums.zuggsoft.com/forums/weblog_entry.php?e=32033
This system is a good workaround, but it work only with the CI framework in the server root.
In my production environment this is not possible.

I think that some user of PhpEd, expert in CI, has been in this situation and perhaps have already solved this problem.

I am newbie with CI (I am still learning), I hope someone can give me some help.

Kenshin

Dmitri,

Maybe you should re-think this, as there absolutely is a way for PhpED to integrate with CodeIgniter specifically. When you say, "But IDE has no clue how to form them for your application", that's a matter that can be solved by learning the very basic architecture that CodeIgniter uses to form segment-based URL's.

The work-arounds for working with CodeIgniter and PhpED are okay, but it could work so much better. Maybe it isn't worth it from a development aspect on your side now, but as framewroks gather more and more attention, more developers are looking for good solutions in an IDE. Since you already have such a strong presence in the php IDE marketplace, a solid integration with a popular framework like CI might go a long way.

I'm not sure how well you integrate with Zend, but even if it's very well, CodeIgniter is hot on Zend's heels because of CI's relatively flat learning curve.

Just a thought.......

I think there is no universal rule for all available php frameworks. The best I can think of is something outlined below:
if user wants to run A.php, IDE should pick B.php (say it is specified in the settings), produce full URL of B.php, translate this URL according to Framework-specific rules, taking into account A.php (or not taking, depends on the other settings), then launch the resulting URL...
Seems it would be much easier to allow Launchbox accept URLs instead of filenames. Then user will be able to start the scripts from there. Right?